TÜRKİYE DIŞ TİCARET HADLERİNİN PREBİSCH-SİNGER HİPOTEZİ KAPSAMINDA ANALİZİ

Author :  

Year-Number: 2021-46
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 1237-1249
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Prebisch (1950) ve Singer (1950), dış ticaret hadlerinin az gelişmiş ülkeler aleyhine hareket ettiğini ifade etmişler ve bu görüş daha sonraları ilgili literatürde Prebisch-Singer tezi olarak adlandırılmıştır. Prebisch-Singer tezi, 1950 yılından itibaren çoğu kez test edilmiş ve elde edilen bulgular genellikle tezin geçerliliğini destekler yönde olmuştur. Ancak özellikle 1990 yılı öncesi yapılan ampirik çalışmalarda kullanılan yöntemlerin günümüz zaman serisi yöntemleriyle kıyaslanması durumunda bu yöntemlerin istatistiksel çıkarım yönünden yetersiz kaldıkları görülmektedir. Bu nedenle ulaşılan sonuçların doğruluğu sorgulanır hale gelmiştir. Bu çalışmada net değişim ticaret hadlerinin uzun dönem itibariyle mamul mallar (sanayi ürünleri) lehine ve birincil mallar (hammadde ve tarım ürünleri) aleyhine eğilim göstereceğini savunan Prebisch-Singer hipotezinin geçerliliği Türkiye özelinde araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla çalışmada öncelikli olarak literatürde Prebisch-Singer tezinin geçerliliğini tartışan ve test eden araştırmalardan bir kısmına tarihsel sıralamayla değinilmiştir. Daha sonra Prebisch-Singer hipotezinin Türkiye’de geçerliliği analiz edilmiştir. Analizde kullanılan veriler üçer aylık olup 1982-2020 dönemini kapsamaktadır. Veri seti üç ayrı alt döneme ayrılmıştır. Hipotezin geçerliliği doğrusal trend, Hodrick-Prescott filtre ve ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımlarıyla araştırılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular söz konusu hipotezin Türkiye özelinde geçerli olmadığına işaret etmektedir

Keywords

Abstract

Prebisch (1950) and Singer (1950) independently asserted that terms of trade acted against underdeveloped countries, and their view was later called the Prebisch-Singer thesis in the relevant literature. The Prebisch-Singer thesis has been tested many times since 1950, and the obtained findings generally support the validity of the thesis. However, when the methods used in empirical studies conducted before 1990 are compared with today's time series methods, it is seen that these methods are insufficient in terms of statistical inference. For this reason, the accuracy of the results reached has become questionable. In this study, the validity of the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis, which argued that the net barter terms of trade tend to be in favor of manufactured goods (industrial products) in the long-run, whereas against primary goods (raw materials and agricultural products), is investigated in Turkey. To this end, firstly, some of the studies arguing and testing the validity of the Prebisch-Singer thesis in the literature are mentioned chronologically. Then, the validity of the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis in Turkey is analyzed. The quarterly data obtained over the period 1982-2020 are utilized in the analysis. The dataset is compulsorily divided into three sub-periods. The validity of the hypothesis is investigated according to the linear trend, Hodrick-Prescott filter, and ARDL bounds test approaches. The obtained findings suggest that the hypothesis is not valid particularly in Turkey

Keywords


  • Arezki, R., Hadri, K., Loungani P. & Rao, Y. (2014). Testing the Prebisch–Singer hypothesis since 1650:

  • Arezki, R., Hadri, K., Loungani P. & Rao, Y. (2014). Testing the Prebisch–Singer hypothesis since 1650:Evidence from panel techniques that allow for multiple breaks. Journal of International Money and Finance, 42(1), 208–223.

  • Aslan, N. & Yörük D. (2008). Teoride ve uygulamada dış ticaret hadleri ve kalkınma ilişkisi. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(2), 33-69.

  • Aslan, M. & Nazlıoğlu, S. (2018). Do ınternational relative commodity prices support the Prebisch-Singerhypothesis? A nonlinear panel unit root testing?. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 21(1), 76-93.

  • Baffes, J. & Etienne, X. L. (2016). Analysing food price trends in the context of Engel’s law and the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis. Oxford Economic Papers, 68(3), 688-713.

  • Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Chang, T., Elmi, Z. & Ranjbar, O. (2018). Re-testing Prebisch–Singer hypothesis: New evidence using fourier quantile unit root test. Applied Economics, 50(4), 441-454.

  • Bilginsoy, C. (1997). A macroeconomic analysis of agricultural terms of trade in Turkey, 1952-1990. Journal of Development Studies, 33(1), 797-819.

  • Blattman, C., Hwang, J. & Williamson, J.G. (2003). The terms of trade and economic growth in the peripherry 1870-1983. NBER Working Paper Series, No: 9940.

  • Bloch, H. & Sapsford, D. (2000). Whither the terms of trade? An elaboration of the Prebisch—Singer hypothesis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24(4), 461-481.

  • Bunzel, H. & Vogelsang, T.J. (2005). Powerful trend function tests that are robust to strong serialcorrelation, with an application to the Prebisch–Singer hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 23(4), 381-394.

  • Cambazoglu, B. & Karaalp, H. S. (2012). Trend in Turkey's terms of trade from 1982 to 2011. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1228-1238.

  • Cederlöf, C. (2012). Are the labor market conditions causing the terms of trade to Deteriorate?: A statisticalevaluation of the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis. The Department of Political Science, Stockholms University.

  • Chakraborty, S. (2012). Is export expansion of manufactured goods an escape route from terms of trade deterioration of developing countries? Journal of South Asian Development, 7(2), 81-108.

  • Chaudhuri, K. (2000). Long run prices of primary commodoties and oil prices. The University of Sydney Working Papers, 2.

  • Chu, K. & Morrison, T.K. (1986). The 1981–82 recession and non-oil primary commodity prices. IMF Staff Papers, 31(1), 93-140.

  • Cuddington, J. T. (2002). Prebisch-Singer redux. Office of Economics Working Paper. US International Trade Commission. Washington.

  • Dadone, A. A. & Di Marco, L. E. (1972). The impact of Prebisch’s ideas on modern economic analysis. International Economics and Development, 19(1), 15-34.

  • Dickey, D.A. & Fuller W.A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427- 431.

  • Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı (2000). Küreselleşme özel ihtisas komisyonu raporu, sekizinci beş yıllık kalkınma planı, Erişim tarihi: 23.02.2021, https://www.sbb.gov.tr.

  • Dunn, R. M. & Mutti, J.H. (2004). International economics, 6. Baskı, Londra, Routledge.

  • Futerman, A.G. & Block, W. E. (2020). An Austrian critique of the Prebisch-Singer theory of the deterioration in the terms of trade. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 12(4), 721-735.

  • Ghoshray, A. (2011). A reexamination of trends in primary commodity prices. Journal of Development Economics, 95(2), 242-251.

  • Grilli, E. R. & Yang, M. C. (1988). Primary commodity prices, manufactured goods prices, and terms of trade of developing countries: What the long-run Show? World Bank Economic Review, 2(1), 1-48.

  • Harvey, D. I., Kellard, N. M., Madsen, J.B. & Wohar, M. E. (2010). The Prebisch-Singer hypothesis: Four centuries of evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(2), 367-377.

  • Husted, S. & Melvin, M. (2013). International economics, 9.Baskı, Pearson Education.

  • Kaplinsky, R. (2006). Revisiting the revisited terms of Trade: Will China Make a Difference? World Development, 34(6), 981-995.

  • Kim, T.H., Pfaffenzeller, S.,Rayner, T. & Newbold, P. (2003). Testing for linear trend with application to relative primary commodity prices. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 24(5), 539-551.

  • Kindleberger, P. C. (1956). Terms of trade for primary products, natural resources and ınternational development – the terms of trade a european case study. MIT and Wiley & Sons Inc., New-York.

  • Kouparitsas, M.A. (1997). North-south terms of trade: An empirical ınvestigation, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper Series, 97(5), 1-17.

  • Law, A.D. (1975). International commodity agreements: Setting, performance and prospects. Lexington Books, MA.

  • Lutz, M. G. (1999). A general test of the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis. Review of Development Economics, 3(1), 44-57.

  • MacBean, A. I. & Nguyen, D.T. (1987). Commodity policies: Problems and prospects, Croom Helm, London.

  • Marinkov, M. & Burger, P. (2005). The various dimensions of commodity dependence in Africa. South African Journal of Economics,73(2), 269-291.

  • Meng, M., Lee, J. & Payne, J.E. (2017). RALS-LM unit root test with trend breaks and non-normal errors: Application to the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis. Study. Nonlinear Dyn. E., 21(1), 31-45.

  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bound testing approaches to the analysis of long run relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289-326.

  • Phillips, P.C. B & Perron, P. (1988), Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-Prebisch, R. (1950). The economic development of latin America and ıts principal problems. Lake Success, New York: United Nations Department of Social Affairs.

  • Pugel, T. (2016). International economics. 16. Baskı, Mc Graw-Hill Education.

  • Robinson, E.A.G. (1954). The problem of living within our foreign earnings, Three Banks Review, 3-16. Salvatore, D. (2013). International economics. 11.Baskı J. Wiley & Sons.

  • Sarkar, P. (1986). The Singer–Prebisch hypothesis: A statistical evaluation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 10(4), 355-371.

  • Seyidoğlu, H. (2013). Uluslararası iktisat. (Teori ve politika – uygulama). 15.Baskı. Seçkin Yayıncılık.Singer, H. W. (1950). The distribution of gains between ınvesting and borrowing countries. American Economic Review, 40 (2), 473-485.

  • Singer, H. W. (1982). Terms of trade controversy and the evolution of soft financing: Early years in theU.N.: 1947-1951. In M. Meierand D. Seers (eds), Pioneers in Development. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 275-303.

  • Taşçı, H.M. & Erçakar, M.E. (2016). Prebisch-Singer tezinin dış ticaret hadleri aracılığıyla Türkiye için test edilmesi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(2), 232-249.

  • Thirlwall, A.P. & Bergevin, J. (1985). Trends, cycles and asymmetries in the terms of trade of primary commodoties from devoloped and less devoloped countries. World Devolopment, 13(7), 805-817.

  • Todaro, M. P. & Smith, S. C. (2012). Economic development. (11th Ed.), Boston: Pearson Education Inc.

  • Yamada, H. & Yoon, G. (2014). When Grilli and Yang meet Prebisch and Singer: Piecewise linear trends in primary commodity. Journal of International Money and Finance, 42, 193-207.

  • Yamak, R. & Yamak, N. (1997). Osmanlı dönemi dış ticaret hadleri ve Prebisch- Singer tezi. İktisat, İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, 137, 68-79.

  • Yamak, R. & Korkmaz, A. (2006). Prebisch-Singer hipotezi ve küçük açık ekonomi varsayımı, Selçuk Üniversitesi Karaman İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 128-143.

  • Zubikova, A. (2017). Resource curse: Case study of Nigeria. 29 May 2017, 8th Economics and FinanceConference, London. Erişim tarihi: 21.02.2021, http://www.iises.net/proceedings/8th-economics-finance- conference-london/front-page.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics